|
By Jonathan Friendly, LCA Board Member
Beauty is said to be in the eye of the beholder; utility is a
little harder to discern.
And that is why reasonable people can disagree about the
greenbelt of natural vegetation that Lake Charlevoix’s towns
and cities are now trying to protect because of its value in
filtering out pollutants and combating erosion.
In the mid-80’s, when the lake level was much higher
than it is now (and the style of summer homes somewhat
more modest), the vegetation formed a mostly green border
marking the line between land and water.
But as the lake has gone down, the exposed littoral of
rock and sand became less appealing to the eye (not to mention
tougher on the feet). Not much grew in the transition
zone, and what did tended to be scrawny, stringy plants and,
more recently, invasives like phragmites australis.
Soaring prices for lakefront property encouraged a new
approach of larger, more imposing houses with manicured,
fertilized lawns that seemingly cried out for more decorative,
man-made shores to mark the boundary between land and
water. The role of the native plants -- taking up phosphates
before they got to the water and aided cladophra bloom --
was easy to overlook. In lot after lot, the new aesthetic overwhelmed
the hodge-podge of marsh milkweed, bristly sedge
and swamp loosestrife.
And those of us – I include myself -- who liked the
shoreline the way nature made it had no inherent right to
complain about what a neighbor wanted to do to make his
beach more fitted to his taste. I forfeited any right to complain
about human artifacts when I got the permits necessary
to perch a blue-topped gazebo near where the water used to
stop, even if the swamp behind the structure was pretty much
what it had been after the glaciers receded 12,000 years ago.
But the fact remains that those greenbelts and the land
below them are important. Without the greenbelts, even
moderate rains can carry pesticides and fertilizers and oils
into the lake. The greenbelts give shelter to nesting birds and
promote the plankton that good fish habitat needs.
If we allow ourselves to continue to disturb them, we risk
losing what we most value, a lake of unsurpassed water quality
surrounded by nature’s tranquility.
The good of a natural shoreline is not always apparent to
the naked eye.
But it is to the thoughtful mind.
Having land on the lake confers great privilege and
equally great responsibility. We need to think before we alter
what nature has given us.
|